Friday, December 31, 2010
farewell, 2010
Sunday, December 12, 2010
GOD VERSUS SCIENCE (It’s a true story – worth reading all the way to the end)
‘Let me explain the problem science has with religion.’
Student: ‘Absolutely. ‘
Prof: ‘Is God good?’
Student: ‘Sure! God’s good.’
Prof: ‘Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?’
Student: ‘Yes’
Prof: ‘Are you good or evil?’
Student: ‘The Bible says I’m evil.’
Prof: ‘So you’re good…!’
Student: ‘I wouldn’t say that…’
‘Then where does Satan come from?’ The student falters. ‘From God’
this world?’
everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil.’
…
Prof: ‘Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?’
with God. There is no evidence, only faith.’
would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy.
isn’t darkness?’
something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing
light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it’s
called darkness, isn’t it? That’s the meaning we use to define the word.
In reality, darkness isn’t. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn’t you?’
a good semester. ‘So what point are you making, young man?’
start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed.’
argue that there is life and then there’s death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can’t even explain a thought.’ ‘It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.’ ‘Now tell me, professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?’
where the argument is going.. A very good semester, indeed.
cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?’
has subsided. ‘To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean.’ The student looks around the room. ‘Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor’s brain?’ The class breaks out into laughter.
sir?’
face unreadable. Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man
answers. ‘I Guess you’ll have to take them on faith.’
life,’ the student continues.
Everyday. It is in the daily example of man’s inhumanity to man. It is in
The multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These
manifestations are nothing else but evil..’
not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like
darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God’s love present in his heart. It’s like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light.’
Albert Einstein wrote a book titled ‘God vs. Science’ in 1921…
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Chelsea 2-0 Arsenal
details of the match is here.
as usual, arsenal played beautifully and made chelsea look like the beast but were (unfortunately for arsenal fans, such as myself T_T), as said, no match for the beast.
in this extraordinary london derby, arsenal played like fireworks; playing gracefully and sparks were sent all over chelsea's half with the likes of samir nasri, young jack wilshere leading the attacks. however, as eye-catching as sparks are, they don't last. and that was proven when most of the attacks were neutralised by chelsea's defenders while the rest are wasted (most of them were marouane chamakh).
chelsea, however, played like nuclear bombs. people don't launch nuclear bombs that often. but when they do, they made sure the impact is devastating. chelsea was like that and didier drogba was the best way to define chelsea's ways of playing. knowing the dreadful impact of destroyer drogba, arsenal made sure (or tried to, anyway) that drogba didn't to touch the ball. this is evident when drogba had about half the chance chamakh had for arsenal and scored an inch-perfect backheel while chamakh wasted his. sigh. felt like crying when drobga scored his 13th goal against arsenal in 13 matches. had almunia been between the posts instead of fabianski (he performed well, in my opinion), or chelsea being a little but more lucky(anelka missed an open goal after intercepting squilacci's back pass and dribbling past fabianski), chelsea would have been easily 4-0 or 5-0 up. and they did this with less possesion and less shots on (and off) target!! even wenger knew that arsenal had advantages in that aspect but didn't take the chances and at this kind of level, you get punished when you don't take your chances.
but on the up side, we finally saw that fabianski is not as bad as he is said to be. true, he makes mistakes (and quite dreadful sometimes) and he was a bit shaky but which keeper doesn't go nervous when drogba runs at you with the force of a charging bull? but he performed well and made some good saves. could've done better with the 1st goal but the second one was just beyond any keeper. wenger could sleep well now knowing that arsenal's goal are in hands safer than almunia
Thursday, September 23, 2010
action, reaction. thx for the lesson my friends
and yesterday, i have made 1 mistake (maybe fatal) that had cost me greatly:
so what exactly did i do. well, i didn do anything wrong, i just forgot to do something right: logout of my facebook account after using keith's laptop. n my dearest friends in gmi reminded me of mistakes by doing those. and the consequence? i think u know it better than i do.
again, every action has a consequence. and my faithful and forever helpful " friends' " spams resulted in me learning an invaluable lesson.
ps: keith, i think your laptop should put a tag on it, like "please logoff after use" the way public toilets have the tag: "please flush after use".
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
A-levels
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
lunch @ Cravings Kitchen & Bistro


(Bok Yi)Monday, May 3, 2010
A warm welcome to the real world
Friday, April 9, 2010
hey, it's been a long time.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Thursday, March 4, 2010
JPJ
Monday, March 1, 2010
I'm my own GRANDFATHER!
Monday, February 22, 2010
life's getting more and more boring
so what exactly am i waiting for? as you all might have guessed, i'm waiting for my SPM results which is supposed to be out by mid or end of march. then, i'll study in GMI (German-Malaysian Institute) which has only 1 intake in July. oh lord, about half more year to wait.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Man, Perodua Viva has to be the suckiest car EVER!
- viva is about 30-40cm longer n 10cm wider.
- viva is more comfortable (obviously)
- viva looks more stylish n modern
- comes with power steering
- cheap
- higher engine power
- higher engine efficiency
- agile
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
I found this short movie while wondering mindlessly in the Internet
I waited for it to load while singing this song.
The internet is really really great.xxx xxxx!
I gotta fast connection, so I don't have to wait. xxx xxxx!
There's always some new site. xxx xxxx!
I browse all day and night. xxx xxxx!
It's like I'm surfing at the speed of li~~~~ght. xxx xx~~~~~xx!
so the movie finished loading and i watched and i found it quite funny. so i downloaded it and decided that i should share the fun.
Enjoy!!
Lord! This video took me a loooooooooooooooooooonnnnngggggg time to load!
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
life after SPM
0.01% x 10=0.1%
0.01% x 100=1%
0.01% x 1000=10%
0.01% x 10000=100%
in another words, if i submit 10000 applications, i'll definitely get a scholarship! fun right?! but maybe i stand a higher chance in some of the applications so the number may go down to 2000, maybe less......
anyway, i took up driving lessons recently and for the 1st time, i drove a car LEGALLY! the difference between the legal driving experience and the illegal driving experience is:
- legal: use nothing but an overused kancil
- illegal: use any car of any type. manual, automatic...... you name it.
- legal: look out for the other cars!
- illegal: look out for the cops!
someone called me crazy for taking up driving because i already have a bike and i'm not getting a car any sooner than the day i buy one for myself. well, it's really nice to be able to wheeze between cars during traffic jams but riding under a scorching sun or in a rain storn isn't something really nice either. besides, riding at about 80km/h in average for 1 full hour really sucks whereas i can go at 100km/h for 2 hours really comfortably. so i prefer to have both options open for me.
besides, i took up some course called the Certified Financial Planning (CFP). it's about planning your budget in order to get a maximum benefit. you can use it to plan for your own future but it also make you eligible to work as a professional financial counselor. imagine ME planning your money for you... hehehe...
*i met clinton otten today in the driving academy and he told me that his brother wesley is a prodigy of him in many ways except that wesley is a later version and also a better one. surprisingly (he said so himself), clinton has done more work to help his brother in his form 4 stuff more than he has done when he was one! what a nice brother, let's give him a round of applause!!
